MaPomDen health And Diet Blog
The Complementary Alternative Medicine, Natural Health And Diets Blog

COVID-19 is unrelated to jab in 68 countries, 2,947 US counties

0 114

COVID-19 injections were presented as the only solution to stop the pandemic. Mass vaccination has taken place on an unprecedented scale, and by October 2021 6.54 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccinations had been administered, representing 47.6% of the world’s population who received at least one dose.1

The mass injection efforts failed to stop the pandemic, however, and a study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology has released bombshell data showing that the rise in COVID-19 in 68 countries around the world and 2,947 counties in the U.S. is unrelated to vaccination levels2

Data shows that jabs don’t work as promised

The official COVID narrative continues to blame the unvaccinated for the ongoing pandemic, even though data shows areas with high vaccination rates like Israel continue to have significant COVID-19 prevalence. As SV Subramanian of the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies and a colleague in the European Journal of Epidemiology noted:3

“Vaccines are currently the number one containment strategy to fight COVID-19 around the world. For example, related to the continued surge in new cases in the United States (US), it is argued that areas with low vaccination rates are driving the narrative.

A similar narrative has also been observed in countries like Germany and the United Kingdom. At the same time, Israel, which has been praised for its quick and high vaccination rates, has also seen a significant resurgence of COVID-19 cases. “

Using data from Our World in Data for cross-country analysis and data from the White House COVID-19 team for U.S. counties, the researchers examined the association between new COVID-19 cases and the percentage of the population fully vaccinated was. Sixty-eight countries were included where “no apparent association was found between the percentage of the population fully vaccinated and new cases of COVID-19 in the past seven days”.

Not only did vaccination fail to reduce the number of new COVID-19 cases, it was also associated with a slight increase. According to the study “[T]The trendline suggests a slightly positive association, so countries with higher percentages of the fully vaccinated population have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.4th

Highly vaxxed countries with higher COVID-19 cases

If there is any doubt about the need to seriously question the global mass injection campaign, this should come to an end: Iceland and Portugal, both of which have fully vaccinated more than 75% of their populations, have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than Vietnam and South Africa, which only have about 10% of their population fully vaccinated.5

Israel is another example. With more than 60% of the population fully vaccinated, it had the highest number of COVID-19 cases per 1 million residents in the past seven days.6th The data from the US states were similar, with new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people “broadly similar” regardless of the percentage of the population fully vaccinated.

“There also does not appear to be a significant signal that COVID-19 cases are declining with a higher percentage of the fully vaccinated population,” they wrote.7th Notably, of the five US counties with the highest vaccination rates – from 84.3% to 99.9% fully vaccinated – four were on the list of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 26.3% of the 57 counties with “low transmission” have low vaccination rates of less than 20%.

The study even took into account a one-month delay that could occur in those who were fully vaccinated, as it allegedly takes two weeks after the last dose for “full immunity” to occur. Nevertheless, “no discernible association between COVID-19 cases and the number of people fully vaccinated” was observed.8th

Main reasons why the dependency on jabs should be re-examined

The study summarized several reasons why “Dependency on Vaccination Only as the Primary Strategy for COVID-19 Containment” should be reassessed. First of all, the effectiveness of the jab is weakening. A report from the Israeli Ministry of Health showed that injecting Pfizer-BioNTech was only 39% effective in preventing COVID-19 infection.9,10 which is “significantly lower than the study’s 96% effectiveness”.11

“There has also been a significant drop in immunity from mRNA vaccines reported six months after immunization,” the researchers noted, adding that even severe hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19, against which the vaccinations supposedly protect, rose from 0 .01 on 9. % or 0 to 15.1% among the fully vaccinated rose from January 2021 to May 2021.12 If the jabs are working as advertised, why haven’t these rates continued to rise instead of fall?

“It is also emerging,” the researchers noted, “that the immunity derived from the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as the immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus.”13th

For example, a retrospective observational study published on August 25, 2021 showed that natural immunity is superior to immunity from COVID-19 vaccinations compared to hospital stay caused by the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.14th

The fact is that while breakthrough cases continue to exist in those who have received COVID-19 injections, it is extremely rare for you to get infected with COVID-19 again after you have had the disease and recovered. How rare? Researchers from Ireland conducted a systematic review of 615,777 people who had recovered from COVID-19, with a maximum follow-up period of more than 10 months.fifteen

“Reinfection was a rare occurrence,” they noted, “… with no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time.” The absolute reinfection rate ranged from 0% to 1.1%, while the median reinfection rate was only 0.27%.16,17th,18th

Another study found similar reassuring results. This was followed by 43,044 SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive people for up to 35 weeks, and only 0.7% were re-infected. When genome sequencing was used to estimate the reinfection risk at the population level, the risk was estimated at 0.1%.19th

There was no evidence of diminishing immunity over seven months of follow-up – unlike the COVID-19 injection – with the researchers’ conclusion, “Reinfection is rarely at least seven months.”20th

Is it all risk without rewards?

The purpose of informed consent is to provide people with all of the data related to a medical procedure so that they can make an informed decision before giving consent. In the case of COVID-19 injections, such data were initially unavailable due to their emergency authorization, and when side effects became known, attempts to share them publicly were silenced.

In August 2021 a large study will be carried out from Israel21 found that Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is linked to a three-fold increased risk of myocarditis,22nd lead to the disease at a rate of 1 to 5 events per 100,000 people.23 Other increased risks were also identified after the COVID-19 vaccination, including lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes), appendicitis, and herpes zoster infection.24

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, is among those who warned that COVID-19 injections not only fail but also put lives at risk.25th According to McCullough, 186 deaths after the COVID-19 injection had been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database by January 22, 2021 – more than enough to hit the worrying mortality signal to halt the program.

“With a program this size, any 150+ deaths would be a red flag,” he said. The US “had 186 dead with only 27 million Americans stabbed”. McCullough believes the COVID-19 jab program would have been suspended in February 2021 due to the security and risk of death if the proper security boards had been in place.26

Since the data show no difference in the rates of COVID-19 cases between those who were vaccinated and those who were not, it seems increasingly likely that the injections are at high risk with very little reward, especially in certain populations such as adolescents. Because of the risk of myocarditis, the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) recommended COVID-9 injections to healthy 12 to 15 year olds.27

Are mass vaccination driving variants?

Along with serious questions about effectiveness, there are alarming claims that the vaccinations increase the infectivity of COVID-19 and promote mutations that lead to variants. When four common mutations were introduced into the Delta variant, Pfizer’s mRNA injection increased its infectivity, making it resistant.28

A delta variant with three mutations has already appeared,29 suggesting that it is only a matter of time before a fourth mutation develops, by which time complete resistance to Pfizer’s vaccination could be imminent.

It is now known that if you pressurize living organisms such as bacteria or viruses, for example with antibiotics, antibodies or chemotherapeutic agents, but do not completely kill them, you can inadvertently encourage their mutation into more virulent strains. Those that escape your immune system survive and select mutations to ensure their continued survival.

Many have warned against immune escape due to the pressures placed on the COVID-19 virus during mass vaccination.30th and another study – this is based on a mathematical model,31 found that a worst-case scenario can develop when a large percentage of a population is vaccinated but virus transmission remains high – as is the case now. This represents the main scenario for developing resistant mutant strains.32

At this point, as the failure of COVID-19 injections can no longer be ignored, serious health risks associated with injections become apparent and there is no difference in new COVID-19 cases in areas with high vaccination rates. It is time to publicly acknowledge that the injections are not a solution. As the researchers from the European of Journal of Epidemiology found:33

“Stigmatization of population groups can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g. To balance learning to live with COVID-19 in the same way, 100 years later we live on with various seasonal changes in the 1918 influenza virus. “

Thank You For Reading!


Leave a comment
Subscribe to our newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest health and diet news, updates and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More